At the top of the list... . The Opportunity Finance Network Board will meet next Wednesday, May 24th, in Philadelphia.
The two major items on the agenda are a review of Guiding Principles for our financing strategies intended to help the opportunity finance system achieve scale--measured by financing flow, or volume. Our financing team, led by Art Fleming and Beth Lipson, is on the verge of introducing two major new initiatives to the membership--a responsible subprime mortgage product that we will pilot over the next 6-9 months and a financing conduit for CDFIs seeking to help manufactured home park residents purchase their parks to preserve affordability. (We are working closely with the New Hampshire Community Loan Fund, which pioneered manufactured home park conversions, and CFED, which is running the I'M HOME program to support manufactured housing as a choice for low-income households.) Both strategies are "mission rich" and introduce new financing systems that CDFIs will, we hope, be able to use if they fit their individual financing approaches. They will not be for every CDFI, but we have heard lots of enthusiasm so far. After the Board meeting, I will share with you the Board's conclusions.
The second major topic is our efforts to leverage the remarkable policy gains we have made in a difficult time and environment. With 62 Senators--comprising 23 Republicans, 1 Independent, and 38 Democrats--supporting our call for an $80 million appropriation for the CDFI Fund, we have crossed two important thresholds behind the leadership of Sandra Kerr and the support of Cheryl Neas. First, in the Senate's eyes, at least, this is no longer "that Clinton program." Because so many of you have taken the time to explain to your Senators what you are accomplishing in your markets, we have achieved broad support that we expect will only grow in the next 2-3 years. Second, because 60 is a magic number in the Senate--60 votes is what you need to override a veto--we have flexed our muscles in a way that people in Washington notice. It is unlikely that the CDFI Fund on its own will ever become the subject of a veto, but 62 supporters--not to mention the appropriations committee members who support us in committee but who do not sign letters like ours as a matter of good governance--sends a clear message.
Look for updates on the Board's discussion and decisions in about a week.
Recent Comments